How to Evaluate a Website Maintenance Provider (Scorecard)

Choosing the wrong website maintenance provider costs more than choosing no provider. A vendor who is slow, inconsistent, or doesn’t test their own work introduces problems while charging you to fix them. Evaluating providers systematically — before you sign — prevents the switch cost of changing vendors six months later.

This guide gives you a scorecard with specific questions, acceptable answers, and red flags. Use it on any provider you’re evaluating.

Key Findings

• Most providers fail the QA question. Ask “what does your testing process look like after a change?” The majority of vendors describe checking that the change looks correct. Fewer than 20% describe a systematic regression process.
• Turnaround time should be a commitment, not an estimate. “Usually within 2–3 days” is not a commitment. “48 hours for routine changes, stated in our service terms” is.
• Platform expertise should be demonstrated, not claimed. “We work with all platforms” is almost never true at a professional level. Ask for specific examples on your platform.

The Evaluation Scorecard

Rate each provider 1–5 on each criterion. A provider scoring below 3 on any critical criterion should be disqualified.

Critical Criteria (disqualify if poor)

1. Turnaround commitment

• 5 (excellent): “48 hours for routine changes, in writing in our service terms”
• 3 (acceptable): “48–72 hours for routine changes”
• 1 (disqualify): “We’ll get to it as soon as possible” or “it depends on our queue”

2. QA process

• 5 (excellent): “We test the updated section, adjacent pages, all forms, and mobile layouts after every change. Regressions we introduce are fixed at no extra charge.”
• 3 (acceptable): “We test on desktop and mobile after each change”
• 1 (disqualify): “We verify the change looks correct” or no mention of testing

3. Platform expertise

• 5 (excellent): Named experience with your platform, examples of specific work, understanding of platform-specific maintenance requirements
• 3 (acceptable): Clear experience with your platform type, can describe common failure modes
• 1 (disqualify): “We handle all platforms” with no specifics

4. Scope definition

• 5 (excellent): Clear written scope with request limits, overage billing at a stated rate, list of what’s out of scope
• 3 (acceptable): General scope description with some limits stated
• 1 (disqualify): No defined scope, “we’ll handle what you need” with no specifics

Important Criteria (strong preference)

5. Regression ownership

• 5 (excellent): “If we introduce a regression, we fix it at no extra charge”
• 3 (acceptable): “We review what happened and decide on a case-by-case basis”
• 1 (red flag): “We bill for any additional work required, including fixing our own issues”

6. Communication process

• 5 (excellent): Defined async request submission system, status tracking, change history documentation
• 3 (acceptable): Clear email-based request process with response acknowledgment
• 1 (red flag): “Just message us whenever” with no defined process or documentation

7. Pricing model

• 5 (excellent): Fixed monthly price with defined scope, overage billing pre-approved before work starts
• 3 (acceptable): Hourly billing with monthly estimate and cap
• 1 (red flag): Open-ended billing with no stated estimate process

Contextual Criteria (matters depending on your needs)

8. Industry experience (critical for regulated industries, less important for general SMBs)

9. Emergency escalation process (critical for e-commerce, important for high-traffic sites)

10. Contract flexibility (month-to-month is optimal; 12-month minimums are excessive for maintenance)

How to Use the Scorecard

1. Ask each question directly during your initial call or via email before signing
2. Score each answer 1–5
3. Any score of 1 on a critical criterion is an immediate disqualifier
4. A total score below 30/50 suggests a provider who will create more problems than they solve
5. A score above 40/50 on the critical and important criteria represents a strong provider

What a Tuesday Engagement Looks Like

Tuesday scores 5 on all critical criteria:

• 48-hour turnaround in writing
• Full regression QA on every change — updated section, adjacent pages, forms, mobile
• Explicit platform expertise on Wix, WordPress, Webflow, and Shopify
• Defined scope with 10 requests per month, clear overage billing

Core Plan — $199/month:

• 10 change requests per month
• 48-hour standard turnaround
• Full regression QA on every change
• Cancel anytime

Get Your Free Website Audit →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the single most important criterion when evaluating a website maintenance provider? QA process. A vendor who doesn’t test systematically after every change will introduce regressions that cost you leads and credibility — and you’ll pay them to fix what they broke.

How long should vendor evaluation take? Most evaluations can be completed in a single 30-minute call and a review of the provider’s service terms. The questions are simple; the answers are either specific or they’re not.

What should I do if a provider won’t give me a written turnaround commitment? Move on. A vendor who can’t commit to a turnaround standard in writing is either too busy to prioritize your work or doesn’t have a process to back up the commitment.

Is there a website maintenance provider that meets all the scorecard criteria? Yes. Tuesday’s Core Plan at $199/month meets all critical criteria: 48-hour turnaround, full regression QA, defined scope, platform expertise, and regression ownership.

Written by the Tuesday team — specialists in website maintenance and care plans for SMBs, with 500+ sites maintained across Wix, WordPress, Webflow, and Shopify.

Evaluate providers with clarity. Get Your Free Website Audit →